The examiner on “Hardtalk” asks difficult questions, and without the possibility, given the clipped world of television, of lengthy responses, Zizek comes across as incapable of successful counterarguments. Is it possible that Zizek needs practice with this kind of television appearance, with providing short and convincing explanations of his positions? The philosopher in Zizek asks at one point to be allowed to finish his sentences, to engage in longer monologues, to treat complex questions with elaborate, complex answers. It is as if Zizek imagines he can have C-Span like television time as his interlocutor peppers Zizek with quotations from Zizek’s own works, and shifts the discussion quickly, leaving Zizek awash in fragmentary responses, most of which never meet the questions head on. This looks like a rhetorical failure, generally speaking, for Zizek. He is much better in other venues, in other media structures.
- The Hans Blumenberg Society Is Open for Membership
- “What People Gladly Accept Cannot Be the Truth”
- Esther Dyson: I own my own content
- Upscale People’s Brains Can Be Stormy
- The door to freedom is on the left
- More Lies about Education
- The Nate Silver Generation?
- A Poverty of Possibilities among the Rich
- Prestigious Institutions where Education is second to Revenue
- Oprah wins in Texas