Category Archives: Uncategorized

These Non-murders Deserve “My Favorite Murder” Treatment

Ross Ulbricht is hardly a household name, but he deserves some attention as this you-won’t-be-able-to-unsee story explains. According to the disturbing yarn, no murders took place, yet someone is persuaded to off several people, but no more than you can count on one hand. The spices in this murder recipe: Bitcoin, drugs, Feds, blackmail. Maybe Karen and Georgia, the co-hosts of “My Favorite Murder,” are already all over this one. If not, some transcripts from the case are now available to provide more than enough content.

photo of mug from "My Favorite Murder"
Image

Hello, December

image of house with wreath on door

Blumenberg Gets Arendt Wrong

Thanks to a clever essay by Zeynep Talay Turner in Interrogating Modernity, I think that Hans Blumenberg understood Arendt, but then attempted an unjustified correction. From the particulars of truth myth arises, but it’s a mistake to impose myth on truth that has not reached maturity. The latter is Blumenberg’s strategic but unfulfilled wish for Arendt’s book about Adolf Eichmann. According to Blumenberg, Arendt failed to grasp the potential mythic moment for Israel in its prosecution of Eichmann, depriving Israel of an opportunity to solidify its legitimacy. Eichmann needed to be more than what he was to fulfill his mythic role as representative of Nazi evil. Arendt, on the other hand, stuck to the position that the truth mattered for justice to be done. She had no idea of Blumenberg’s expectations, which didn’t see the light of day until after his death with the publication of Blumenberg’s “Moses the Egyptian.”

The above should be shelved as early reflections requiring a period in an oak cask to obtain the proper flavor and aging. Usually, such thoughts are stored in an underground vault at a specific temperature and humidity, but this week, I’m releasing some things early.

Image

Not a Selfie

photo of protest in Minneapolis

Image

Oedipal Awakenings

screenshot of story from Washington Post

Review of “A Rocky Divorce”

photo of book coverAs “a trained seal of the critical fraternity” – Raymond Chandler’s words –, I suppose my job is no more than to say whether Matt Coleman’s A Rocky Divorce (2019) is a good piece of fiction. It is, and if Chandler had his way, this review might stop there. However, we have some complications.

The first complication is that I had already read Juggling Kittens. That novel set a standard that A Rocky Divorce does not equal. A defense might be that I’m comparing apples and kittens. True enough, which brings me to the second complication. A Rocky Divorce is the start of a series, while Juggling Kittens is what the people in the book biz now call a Standalone. A Rocky Divorce has some burdens attendant with a series that Juggling Kittens did not have to haul.

Before laying out all the details of my relatively minor hesitations, it seems fitting the holiday spirit (December) that the virtues of A Rocky Divorce receive their due. Rocky, Coleman’s detective (Raquel “Rocky” Champagnolle), brings Texarkana to life, often against the place’s will. In general, the characters in Rocky’s orbit are settled in their ways, wanting to lie low, but receptive to wild pitches, sometimes even willing to supplement Rocky’s bold ideas with their own improvisations. Everyone can shine when the brassy dame is around. Rocky, as a character type, is at least as old as Mae West, with the let’s-save-the-day-by-putting-on-a-show mentality of Ethel Merman. Rural routines don’t stand a chance with Rocky in the picture. The characters in Rocky’s scenes either raise their game, verbally and otherwise, or they’re reduced to bit parts in someone else’s drama.

In Texarkana, as in most rural areas, a Rocky might not last long as an outsider. Rocky has roots in the community, and other people in Texarkana know her family, and some are indebted to Rocky’s father. In part, Rocky succeeds because she is part of the community. She doesn’t aim to transcend the venue. Rocky isn’t unhappy with Texarkana, wishing it were more like Austin or New York City. That rapport with her surroundings generates some advantages for Rocky. The shared history is a foundation from which Rocky can launch some schemes.

It’s difficult to tell whether Juggling Kittens and A Rocky Divorce had the same editor. Juggling Kittens seems to have been properly trimmed, whereas A Rocky Divorce doesn’t hit the page running. The pacing isn’t as sharp as in Juggling Kittens, though when A Rocky Divorce hits high gear, it gives its reader an enjoyable ride.

Since it’s meant to be the first in a series of novels, A Rocky Divorce has to conclude with some open-ended items that will be the bread crumbs readers will follow to the next book. No issue there. My main hesitation is with A Rocky Divorce’s hyperactivity when it comes to trendy snark. “I prefer Miss Marple, but with an ass that won’t quit. More like a mix between Olivia Benson, Veronica Mars, and Kim Kardashian. Like if Rizzoli and Isles raised the love child of Peter Dinklage and Jennifer Lopez.” It’s as if the novel works too hard to give itself a tone of Leslie-Jones-comes-to-Texarkana. Doubtless more than one woman in Texarkana has called another woman “girl” over the years. Yet, too many instances of “girl” feel as if they’re accompanied by a flamboyant snap of the fingers, a firming of the spine, and a rapid twist of the neck, e.g., “Girl, I heard you’re a regular Nancy Drew.”

To confirm the problem with the trendy snark, consider a rewriting of the passage from the novel above using 1970s TV-speak: “I prefer Barbara Bain, but with Lucille Ball’s luscious lips. More like a mix between Peggy Lipton, Elizabeth Montgomery, and Jo Anne Worley. Like if Columbo and McCloud were a gay couple raising the love child of Tom Jones and Shirley Jones.” The best job of mapping the 70s on to the passage from A Rocky Divorce reveals the built-in obsolescence of the approach. Now imagine a rewriting of Coleman’s passage using references from 70s Canadian TV. Coleman is much better off when he makes use of less unstable elements: “Jen, we can spend all our time stomping out flying monkeys. Or we can go straight for the wicked witch.” You can put those sentences in an oak barrel for smooth aging.

Matt Coleman has the writerly goods. That’s why this reader prefers less trendy snark and more of “I like my tea like I like my men. Transparent, bitter, and disappointing.” The trendy snark, more often than not, disappoints, like having Stephen King write “boo!” It’s Stephen bloody King, and you know he can boo better. Texas already has its Joe Bob Briggs. Coleman has the talent to shine far brighter than Joe Bob, and he demonstrates that he isn’t always tempted by low-hanging fruit. For example, one of the characters in A Rocky Divorce attempts to convince Rocky that Rocky’s imagined narrative about the kind of case that interests her is over the top. Rocky has proposed a situation in which the person Rocky is helping has a grandmother with a lesbian lover. Jen, Rocky’s friend, responds, “There is no lesbian lover.”

If Coleman can refrain from indulging Rocky’s weakness for lesbian lovers when it comes to storytelling, we can expect the Rocky series could make Coleman the Molly Ivins of detective fiction.

photo of poster of film about Molly Ivins

Image

We’ll Be Mooned on Sunday

image of moon

Image

Things Won’t Be the Same Tomorrow

graphic of happy new year

Image

100th Anniversary of Armistice

photo of veterans for peace

Quotation of the Day

The world of academic research had not turned out to be the paradise of ideas or the whip-smart writerly milieu that I had imagined when I set out. I felt too keenly the strictures of a scholarly style that seemed in fact somewhat at odds with the academic writing I loved most…. I was twenty-six, and already grieving the apparent loss of something which that night I could only vaguely formulate. Something to do with a wider sense of cultural criticism and curiosity, something I thought to do with the essay as a form, something to do with writing as such. It did not help my mood that I had recently come across a statistic to the effect that the average academic article was read by a mere five people.

— Brian Dillon, Objects in This Mirror (2014), p. 12