Tag Archives: New York Times

When Security = Negligence

For a while, in 2019, the update server’s password for SolarWind’s network management software was reported to be “solarwinds123.” — see the full article.

The next time your institution insists that its choice for outsourcing computer services will be safe, remind them of SolarWinds.

SolarWinds logo

Look Who’s Talking

Looks as if some are now willing to wonder why workers’ voices don’t find the same level of press coverage as CEOs who want to speak:

screenshot from NYT about WSJ

You can also read that the wealthy classes have little interest in introspection, but prefer to make endless judgments about the less wealthy.

He’s More “Real” than You

photo from Jeeves and Wooster

The educated folks sometimes get airs about them. It’s the reason the perfume industry thrives. We need to spice the air after one of these people fouls a room. The person in this example is a former dean of the Yale Law School, who has somehow missed the meaning of the cornucopia of lawyer jokes. Here’s the pollution our former law school administrator is spreading:

Some human beings are not only brighter than others but wiser, nobler, more advanced in the art of living. [They are] more real than others, more fully alert or alive.

Poor Anthony Kronman imagines himself more “real” than you.

Bad News for the Holidays

There is no such thing as healthy obesity.

Science ruins the holidays again.  See this New York Times article.

More Madoffs in Your Future

photo of cash register

Photo courtesy of Flickr Creative Commons

The subject today is Katharine Brooks, director of the liberal arts career center at the University of Texas, Austin.  In a New York Times article about the ongoing disappearance of the liberal arts in public higher education in the United States, Ms. Brooks displays her awareness of the expected rhetorical gesture for the article and an unawareness that the logical conclusion of the rhetorical posture she assumes would mean that she will eventually be unemployed.  In an article that does not blink about institutions opting to do away with philosophy and classics majors, Ms. Brooks offers up the following bromide: “Particularly as money gets tighter, people are going to demand more accountability from majors and departments.”

Yes, accountability.  Strange, coming from someone in Texas, the land of no accountability, unless you are in a certain location in Huntsville.  Still, this is the ideology Ms. Brooks has been fed, and she will regurgitate it as needed.  A financial decision is made by a state legislature, or by a Chancellor, or a dean, and the justification turns out to be “a demand for accountability.”  Whence this demand?  Do you see Americans bearing pitchforks and torches in the streets over the bonuses paid to corporate executives who mismanaged companies that were part of the series of financial crises during the past two years?  Were citizens asking for heads on platters when they learned that millions were handed over in Iraq without receipts, when briefcases full of money were given to people without any attempt to keep a record of the transactions?  The accountability for the infamous Bridge to Nowhere?  Ms. Brooks has fallen victim to rhetoric.  Accountability functions as a thin cover for other agendas.

The loss of philosophy majors, classics programs, and the slashing of budgets for the liberal arts to shift funding to management and business and online programs — all that is about money, not accountability.  In fact, the Texas state legislature, in particular, has been quite clear about reducing pubic funding for higher education (a nationwide trend), and logically that should mean that Ms. Brooks ought to be less accountable, since the legislature has reduced its stake in higher education.  That reminds us of the traditional divide between logic and rhetoric.  Ms. Brooks seems happy with the notion that the purpose of higher education is not learning or education, but employment and a career. Her career is at a career center.  The higher part of higher education once reminded all of us about worlds beyond careers, utilitarianism, and cost-benefit analyses.  Ms. Brooks wants to keep us grounded, low. Anything that smacks of higher-level concerns (such as the kind of talk that might occur in philosophy and classics courses) deserves not more attention and funding, but less and none on Ms. Brooks’ method of accounting.

Sack the Administrators for the Good of Higher Education

The share of higher education budgets that goes to instruction has declined, while the portion spent on administrative costs has increased — via College Students Paying More for Less – NYTimes.com.

A colleague has written from University of Tennesse at Martin that the administration there plans to consolidate departments in order to save approximately $400,000.  These kinds of amalgamations will take place more frequently as the economic problems deepen.  The solution that fails to occur first to many administrators is the abolition of administrators to save money.  The New York Times article presents data indicating that is where the trimming should occur, since administration has grown over the years at the expense of instruction.  Call this trimming data-driven management.